Forgive the low resolution, still learning how to output higher resolutions from novel ai and other models.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JpBVGmBOYY8JaXj3Ly_sY0VigP2whaK7/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17yiQ8D08AgOltzFiw7JVdLgQBqqzqLMJ/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_f0jzHGCvV5DIb8oMOrjycmNyyh-_3JU/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EQ67syBMqSfx-TY4uxKN9yq2lwgNXVdX/view?usp=sharing
I've been seeing AI illustrated size art and wanted to investigate and play around with it myself. I certainly isn't as easy as click and boom...quality size art. While that AI models do make it more efficient to make quality size art, it takes some trial and error before you get something useable, and even then, you are limited because these models use already existing art to derive its art. The more specific you want to get the more difficult it becomes to get an output that matches your intention.
AI art can certainly be an excellent way for people who are not artistically inclined to quickly conceptualize ideas, and even use references to learn from. But for now, making art the old fashion way is still the best way to go. AI models also have an ethical concern of not crediting original artists that the neural networks pull from. For all of these reasons, I may be incorporating some type of AI illustration for special projects but for right now its only something to experiment with.
Some of these pieces required some cleanup and repainting, but generally, I was surprised that the ai model could get me 70% of the way there. Let me know what you all think.