DESCRIPTION
As official clarifications from the administration indicate, the criteria for evaluating publications are purely subjective. This confirms the possibility of removing content without objective and logical justification.
There is a tendency for an author's high popularity or regular publication of materials to become risk factors: publications can be cancelled based on their potential commercial benefits or audience reach. Such actions call into question the principles of fairness and transparency of the platform's rules.
I believe that each community member will be able to independently assess the current situation and draw appropriate conclusions about the bias of these measures against my work.